http://www.bartleby.com/61/25/I0052500.html
Make sure you read their "usage note" for "impact"--finally, someone says it. In case the link lets you down, here is the blurb:
"The use of impact as a verb meaning “to have an effect” often has a big impact on readers. Eighty-four percent of the Usage Panel disapproves of the construction to impact on, as in the phrase social pathologies, common to the inner city, that impact heavily on such a community; fully 95 percent disapproves of the use of impact as a transitive verb in the sentence Companies have used disposable techniques that have a potential for impacting our health. •It is unclear why this usage provokes such a strong response, but it cannot be because of novelty. Impact has been used as a verb since 1601, when it meant “to fix or pack in,” and its modern, figurative use dates from 1935. It may be that its frequent appearance in the jargon-riddled remarks of politicians, military officials, and financial analysts continues to make people suspicious. Nevertheless, the verbal use of impact has become so common in the working language of corporations and institutions that many speakers have begun to regard it as standard. It seems likely, then, that the verb will eventually become as unobjectionable as contact is now, since it will no longer betray any particular pretentiousness on the part of those who use it. See Usage Note at contact [this is awesome, read this one too: http://www.bartleby.com/61/49/C0594900.html]."
The OED, while it tracks the evils committed by idiots (many of course in "social-science") that made this word what it is today, does not chide the morons the way they should. Interesting.
From the OED On-Line:
3. intr. a. To come forcibly into contact with a (larger) body or surface. Const. various preps.
b. fig. To have a (pronounced) effect on.
4. trans. To cause to impinge or impact on, against, etc.
Hence impacting ppl. a., impinging, colliding.
Stay tuned for a list of other calamities of language! Next time: "incentivize!"

2 comments:
No kidding, huh? This is a toughie for anal retentive grammar geeks like me. One of the cool things about language (in my opinion at any rate) is the changing nature of it. How words get adopted and created and morphed. It's fascinating, right? But the downside of such change is that some words become obsolete just as some languages become obsolete earning the title of "Dead Langauge" like Yiddish which sadly is one of those that is on the downward slope. (But then again, it's not that old of a language anyways, right?)
But the anal side gets the better of me when folks make up words like "irregardless." ACK! I want to run away screaming when I hear people use that word!
And michael's pet peeve which I hear him lament here and again is how the word "ironic" has become thrown around so haphazardously so that every day users don't seem to know what it really means anymore.
Irony, when used properly can be such a witty treat. Instead it's become regarded as the better educated cousin to describe situations that you would remark as being mildly interesting or vaguely coincidental. Something to sprinkle into your speech to make what you're describing sound a little more important, it's not just coincidence! It's IRONIC. Maybe we're all just looking for a little more magic in our every day life. ("Ironically, the car accident happened on my birthday..." mildly interesting? Vaguely coincidental? Who cares? Or am I being too cynical?)
In my everyday corporate-speak however, I have embraced using contact as a verb. Just vague enough. It suits my needs you know.
Thanks for this food for thought on a Thursday mornin'!
As far as "ironic" is concerned, I think that Alanis Morissette bears a great deal of blame in muddying the waters for our generation. Her mangling of irony, pathos, and tragedy is probably record setting for a single song. A contender for sheer linguistic confusion would be the mystery lyric in "Blinded by the Light": Wrapped up like a ...ce?
Post a Comment